Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

HorizonLifeTime.comHorizonLifeTime.com

Editor's Pick

Case v. Montana Brief: Limit Loopholes to the Fourth Amendment

Christine Marsden

The Founders envisioned the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement as a strong wall safeguarding citizens’ lives and property. Over time, its protections have been systematically eroded. One particularly gaping hole is the emergency aid exception, which allows officers to enter a home without a warrant if they believe an emergency inside requires their immediate assistance. 

In 2021, Montana police cited this exception to enter the home of Petitioner William Trevor Case. Police claimed that the emergency at issue was due to Case’s ex-girlfriend reporting that he had threatened to commit suicide. Despite professing that they had no time to wait for a warrant, the officers waited 40 minutes before entering. During their search of the house, they eventually discovered Case, as well as a handgun in a nearby laundry basket. After Case was charged with felony assault of a police officer, he argued that the gun should be suppressed because the officers violated the Fourth Amendment by searching his home. 

The trial court denied Case’s motion to suppress. In a 4–3 decision, the Montana Supreme Court upheld that ruling, holding that officers only need reasonable suspicion that an emergency exists to enter a home without a warrant—rather than probable cause, which is a stricter standard. 

The US Supreme Court granted Case’s cert petition. Cato and the Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed a brief arguing that warrantless home entries based on mere reasonable suspicion of exigent circumstances violate the Fourth Amendment and needlessly threaten the safety of citizens and law enforcement. If Montana police did not have probable cause to enter Case’s home, their search should be declared unconstitutional. If the Court declines to affirm a categorical warrant requirement, it should, at a minimum, clarify that the emergency aid exception requires probable cause. This higher standard follows from the text of the Fourth Amendment, preserves the sanctity of the home, and reduces the risks that warrantless entries pose to both residents and law enforcement.







    Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.




    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    You May Also Like

    Investing

    Collaboratively administrate turnkey channels whereas virtual e-tailers. Objectively seize scalable metrics whereas proactive e-services.

    Investing

    Quickly coordinate e-business applications through revolutionary catalysts for change. Seamlessly underwhelm optimal testing procedures processes.

    Tech News

    It’s been 25 years since the first Final Cut Pro was announced. More than a decade after the launch of Final Cut Pro X,...

    World News

    At first glance, it might seem extreme—even offensive—to compare anti-fossil fuel climate policies to Stalin’s deliberate starvation of millions during the Holodomor. But in...